News from the Tennessee Valley State, Local and National news
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2006
HOME | NEWS | ARCHIVES | OBITUARIES | WEATHER

Daily graphic by Laura Taylor

Local schools watching high court integration case
Justices' ruling may affect state

By Bayne Hughes
hughes@decaturdaily.com 340-2432

Local school officials are trying to determine if two U.S. Supreme Court cases will affect their school systems and their desegregation plans.

The court Monday wrestled with voluntary integration plans in public schools, asking whether programs in Louisville, Ky., and Seattle are acceptable moves toward student diversity or other names for illegal racial quotas.

Three local systems, Decatur and Lawrence and Limestone counties, are under federal desegregation orders. Each works under plans aimed at making their schools more diverse.

Decatur Superintendent Sam Houston said the difference in Louisville and Seattle cases and the local cases are those two cities achieved "unitary status," a term showing that they no longer operate under a federal court order.

"I'm not a lawyer," Houston said. "But on the surface, it doesn't appear our situations are the same."

A decision in the case, however, could reach to Alabama if the court rules school systems can't base actions on race.

Decatur's new elementary school desegregation plan, which began with the start of the 2006-07 school year in August, uses a magnet school program as an integration tool. The object of the magnet school is to get non-black students to attend schools in black neighborhoods.

Magnet school enrollment is based on 10 elements, some of which include race, academic and leadership abilities and artistic abilities. In return, the school system has two satellite zones in the Benjamin Davis Elementary School neighborhood. Black students in these zones attend either Eastwood or Chestnut Grove, both of which would be predominantly white without the plan. West Decatur Elementary is the only predominantly black school in Decatur under the new plan.

In Limestone, white students in the Belle Mina area attend Tanner High School, while black students attend East Limestone High School or Creekside Elementary. Limestone asked the federal government for unitary status, but has not received a response.

In Lawrence, Hazlewood and R.A. Hubbard high schools are the only predominantly black schools. The school system is still trying to get a new desegregation plan approved.

Kennedy vote

According to The Associated Press, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who could hold the decisive vote, joined his conservative colleagues in expressing deep skepticism about the programs.

The Seattle district seems to be telling its high school students who are subject to the plan that "everybody can get a meal," but that only certain people can get "dessert," Kennedy said. He was referring to the fact that some students did not get assigned to the schools they preferred based on their race.

'Troubling case'

About Louisville's system-wide assignment plan, Kennedy said, "It's a troubling case."

The court's four liberal justices indicated they see no constitutional problem with school districts that factor in a student's race in an effort to have individual school populations approximate the racial makeup of the entire system. Federal appeals courts have upheld both programs.

In Louisville, the school system spent 25 years under a federal court order to desegregate its system. The school board decided to keep much of the court-ordered plan in place to prevent schools from re-segregating.

"What's constitutionally required one day is constitutionally prohibited the next day? That's very odd," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said.

Francis Mellen Jr., representing the Louisville schools, called the plan a success story that enjoys broad community support, including among parents of white and black students.

Still, Kennedy wanted to know that even assuming the school board's good faith, can it assign students "based on the color of an individual child's skin?"

The justices and lawyers arguing the cases referred repeatedly to a 2003 Supreme Court ruling that permitted the limited consideration of race to attain a diverse student body on the college level.

Chief Justice John Roberts expressed concern about making school assignments "based on skin color" and not "any other factor."

Race is but one factor?

Attorney Michael Madden, representing the Seattle school district, said race is but one factor, that it is relied on only in some instances and then only at the end of a lengthy process.

Madden drew a distinction between the Seattle school program and the subject of the court's 2003 decision, which narrowly approved the University of Michigan law school affirmative action admissions program.

"This is not like being denied admission to a state's flagship university," Madden told Roberts. The Seattle students are "not being denied admission, they are being redistributed."

Amid the oral arguments, pro-affirmative action demonstrators bearing "Fight For Equality" placards marched on the sidewalk in front of the Supreme Court in a brisk wind. A parent-teacher group from Chicago and several civil rights groups were among those sponsoring the demonstration.

Demonstrators

Demonstrators chanted "Equal education, not segregation" and "We won't go to the back of the bus, integration is a must." Some held signs that read "Stop racism now." Among the crowd were representatives of the National Organization for Women, the NAACP and students from Howard University.

Though outnumbered, there were some in the crowd from the other side.

"Regardless of how well-motivated, allowing the state to engineer racial mixing only creates racial stereotypes and increases racial tension," said Terry Pell, president of the Center for Individual Rights, a public interest law firm. "The court needs to put an end to state-mandated tinkering with race."

The school policies in contention are designed to keep schools from segregating along the same lines as neighborhoods. In Seattle, only high school students are affected. Louisville's plan applies systemwide.

"The plan has prevented the re-segregation that inevitably would result from the community's segregated housing patterns and that most likely would produce many schools that might be perceived as 'failing,' " the Seattle school district said in its brief to the high court.

The Bush administration has taken the side of the parents who are suing the school districts, much as it intervened on behalf of college and graduate students who challenged Michigan's affirmative action policies in 2003.

The court upheld race-conscious admissions in higher education in a 5-4 opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has since retired. The cases are Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 05-908; and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 05-915.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Copyright 2005 THE DECATUR DAILY. All rights reserved.
AP contributed to this report.

Save $84.50 a year off our newsstand price:
Subscribe today for only 38 cents a day!

Leave feedback
on this or
another
story.

Email This Page


  www.decaturdaily.com